← All 2026 races
H4AZ06045
SCHWEIKERT, DAVID S. Incumbent
18.1
Influence Score · 2026
Least exposed
Sitting member — full twelve-axis v8 score available.
View full dossier →
Score components
| Axis | Raw | Normalized (pts) | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct contributions | $0 | 0.00 | 2026 cycle, principal committee |
| Outside spending — direct support | $7K | — | PACs that directly supported this candidate |
| Outside spending — indirect (OPPOSE against opponents) | $349K | — | OPPOSE spending against opponents in the same race, attributed proportionally |
| Outside spending — OPPOSE against this candidate | $71K | — | PACs that spent to defeat this candidate (not scored on this axis) |
| Total outside spending in favor | $357K | 0.00 | direct + indirect — drives the outside-spending axis |
| Lobbying exposure | $0 | 0.00 | Committee jurisdiction match |
| Vote alignment | 0.000 | 0.00 | Sponsor-aligned roll calls |
| Contribution timing — money arriving near key votes | 0.0000 | 0.00 | Receipts timed to legislative action |
| Dark-money exposure | 0.0000 | 0.00 | Disclosed-vs-dark outside spending share |
| Personal trade direction | 0.000 | 0.00 | STOCK Act buys in jurisdiction |
Race matchup AZ-1
| Candidate | Party | Status | Direct $ | Outside $ | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHWEIKERT, DAVID S. | REP | Inc. | $0 | $0 | 18.1 | Least exposed |
| SHAH, AMISH DR. | DEM | Open | $5.49M | $165K | 8.7 | Substantially backed |
| TREBLE, JONATHAN | DEM | Open | $1.23M | $682K | 5.8 | Modestly backed |
| GALAN-WOODS, MARLENE | DEM | Open | $1.18M | $874K | 5.7 | Modestly backed |
| FEELY, THOMAS JAMES | REP | Open | $863K | $1.13M | 4.7 | Modestly backed |
| SWOBODA, GINA | REP | Open | $404K | $358K | 2.3 | Lightly backed |
| MCCARTNEY, RICK | DEM | Open | $290K | $358K | 1.9 | Lightly backed |
| GORDON, MARK ROBERT | DEM | Open | $222K | $358K | 1.6 | Lightly backed |
| CHAPLIK, JOSEPH | REP | Open | $205K | $394K | 1.6 | Lightly backed |
Challenger and open-seat scores reflect contributions, outside spending, and dark-money exposure only — a maximum of about 23. They are not directly comparable to incumbent scores, which run 0–100 across all twelve axes. Compare the dollar columns (Direct $, Outside $) for a like-for-like view.