Tommy Tuberville
Republican
· AL Senate · 119th Congress
Senate Committee on Health (Chair) · Senate Committee on Agriculture · and Forestry · Risk Management · and Trade · and Natural Resources · Specialty Crops · and Research · and Credit · Senate Committee on Armed Services · and Pensions · Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs · Senate Special Committee on Aging
Influence Score
41.0
Least exposed
↑ +5.8
vs 118th (35.2)
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
0.9
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.9
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$130,005
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$6,619
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
7.2
/ 10
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
3.2
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.0
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
8.5
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
2.9
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
6.8
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
1.4
/ 12
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $58.52M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $117K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
| Congress | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| 116th · 2019-2021 | — | — |
| 117th · 2021-2023 | 61.6 | Moderately exposed |
| 118th · 2023-2025 | 35.2 | Least exposed |
| 119th · 2025-2027 | 41.0 | Least exposed |
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Network
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP FUND INC.
Total money from this network
$186,636
Number of funding networks contributing
1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Network
SENATE CONSERVATIVES ACTION
Share from this one network
29.6%
Amount from this network
$232,344
Total from all networks
$785,834
Networks contributing
188
— ◊ —
Who funds Tuberville
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
$290,181
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
0.1%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
0.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Biggest clusters of timed money
ANIMAL CARE CLINIC
$300
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
$250
SELMA DOCTORS CLINIC
$100
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$3.32M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$3.12M
CHARTER
$2.64M
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
$2.06M
HARRIS
$2.03M
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
$2.00M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$1.86M
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES
$1.55M
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES
$1.38M
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
$1.36M
LEIDOS
$1.28M
AMGEN
$1.25M
NIRVANA TECHNOLOGY
$1.20M
CSX
$1.17M
PFIZER
$1.17M
LEIDOS
$1.10M
T-MOBILE
$1.02M
WINKLEVOSS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
$1.00M
SEQUOIA CAPITAL
$1.00M
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK
$954K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Tommy Tuberville comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
By funding network
CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION
$803K
SAFEGUARDING OKLAHOMA VALUES PAC
$321K
SENATE CONSERVATIVES ACTION
$130K
HUNTER ACTION FUND (HAF)
$120K
SWAMP DRAINERS FOUNDATION
$106K
ALABAMA CHRISTIAN CONSERVATIVES (ACC)
$87K
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. POLITICAL VICTORY FUND
$25K
ONE COUNTRY FUND
$16K
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS INC PAC
$10K
ALABAMA REPUBLICAN PARTY
$10K
ALABAMA SWAMP DRAINERS PAC
$6K
NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND
$5K
REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FREEDOM FUND
$5K
VOTE LOCAL VOTE BLUE
$4K
REALLY AMERICAN PAC
$1K
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
11 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $17K to Tommy Tuberville across 15 contributions.
Total from shared contributors
$17K
Shared contributors
11
Contributions
15
By cycle
| Cycle | Shared donors | Gifts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 1 | 1 | $1K |
| 2024 | 9 | 11 | $13K |
| 2026 | 2 | 3 | $3K |
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
1 former staff member
who worked for Tommy Tuberville or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
| Lobbyist | Former position | Firm | Clients | Filings | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JORDAN MILLS | Regional Director, Senator Tuberville | WILLIAMS AND JENSEN, PLLC | 14 | 84 | 2023–2025 |
— ◊ —
Tommy Tuberville ranks among the least exposed members of this Congress relative to their colleagues. Money may flow, but the votes do not track the top funding networks. Least exposed is a relative position, not a finding of no exposure.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required