Young Kim
Republican · CA-40 · 118th Congress
and Workforce Development (Chair) · House Committee on Financial Services · Illicit Finance · and International Financial Institutions · House Committee on Foreign Affairs · Global Health · and Global Human Rights · the Pacific · Central Asia · and Nonproliferation · House Committee on Science · and Technology · House Committee on Small Business · and Capital Access · House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party
Influence Score
77.2
Highly exposed
↑ +9.1 vs 118th (77.2)
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
9.2
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
5.5
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$7,327,280
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$188,380
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
2.2
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
6.9
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
1.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
12.1
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
10.0
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
4.9
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
10.1
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
PRO-ISRAEL AMERICA PAC $9,953 direct
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $7,900 direct
REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (RJC-PAC) $2,500 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $21.84M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, China. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $44K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 &mdash;
117th · 2021-2023 68.4 Highly exposed
118th · 2023-2025 77.2 Highly exposed
119th · 2025-2027 86.3 Most exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Network FAIRSHAKE
Total money from this network $2,886,320
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 22.5%
Amount from this network $1,562,500
Total from all networks $6,944,552
Networks contributing 662
— ◊ —
Who funds Kim
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 77.2 · Highly exposed · votes with them 81%
$8,933,516
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 72.5%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 58.5%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 38
Money that arrived near votes $113K
Distinct donors 47
Distinct employers 30
Share of their total fundraising 1.60%
Biggest clusters of timed money
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT
20230728 · 2 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (post)
$7K
AQR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
20230615 · 2 contributions · Finance · 2d from vote (mixed)
$7K
CANTOR FITZGERALD
20240201 · 2 contributions · Finance · 4d from vote (pre)
$7K
CHARLES SCHWAB
20230616 · 3 contributions · Finance · 3d from vote (mixed)
$7K
FOUNDERS FUND
20240216 · 2 contributions · Finance · 10d from vote (mixed)
$7K
STEPHENS
20230615 · 2 contributions · Finance · 2d from vote (mixed)
$7K
WINKLEVOSS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
20240703 · 2 contributions · Finance · 5d from vote (mixed)
$7K
FOUNDERS FUND
20240229 · 2 contributions · Finance · 6d from vote (pre)
$4K
BLACKSTONE
20240913 · 1 contributions · Finance · 5d from vote (pre)
$3K
CENTAURIS FINANCIAL
20240226 · 1 contributions · Finance · 3d from vote (pre)
$3K
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
AH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
12 contributions · cycle 2024
$67.01M
ORACLE
147 contributions · cycle 2022
$30.19M
CITADEL ASSET MANAGEMENT
5 contributions · cycle 2022
$27.00M
CITADEL ASSET MANAGEMENT
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$17.00M
EMC
50 contributions · cycle 2024
$15.52M
ADELSON DRUG CLINIC
3 contributions · cycle 2022
$12.50M
THE BLACKSTONE
13 contributions · cycle 2022
$10.64M
RYAN SPECIALTY
3 contributions · cycle 2022
$10.26M
STG
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$10.00M
ADELSON DRUG CLINIC
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$10.00M
REYES
15 contributions · cycle 2022
$9.33M
REYES
14 contributions · cycle 2024
$9.15M
MOUNTAIRE
27 contributions · cycle 2024
$9.13M
HOMEMAKER
9,474 contributions · cycle 2024
$8.09M
THE CHARLES SCHWAB
7 contributions · cycle 2022
$7.51M
SAND HILLS PUBLISHING
6 contributions · cycle 2022
$7.50M
THE DUCHOSSOIS
33 contributions · cycle 2024
$6.68M
HOMEMAKER
7,759 contributions · cycle 2022
$6.47M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
62,034 contributions · cycle 2022
$6.33M
EMC
94 contributions · cycle 2022
$6.27M
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Young Kim comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $3.84M
Disclosed outside spending $3.49M
Dark-money outside spending $357K
Share that is dark money 9.30%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $7K
Groups hiding their donors 6
By funding network
HOUSE MAJORITY PAC NETWORK
for them $10K · against them $5.09M · 53 transactions
$5.10M
SLF PAC
for them $445K · against them $2.89M · 25 transactions
$3.33M
FAIRSHAKE
for them $1.92M · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$1.92M
AMERICANS 4 SECURITY PAC
for them $0 · against them $1.42M · 8 transactions
$1.42M
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS CONGRESSIONAL FUND
for them $915K · against them $0 · 18 transactions
$915K
DCCC
for them $0 · against them $436K · 14 transactions
$436K
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION
for them $305K · against them $0 · 24 transactions
$305K
AMERICAN FUTURE FUND
for them $284K · against them $0 · 7 transactions
$284K
AMERICAN FUTURE FUND POLITICAL ACTION
for them $113K · against them $0 · 6 transactions
$113K
PRIORITIES USA ACTION
for them $0 · against them $107K · 13 transactions
$107K
VOTEVETS.ORG ACTION FUND
for them $0 · against them $105K · 4 transactions
$105K
SPIRIT OF AMERICA PAC
for them $0 · against them $86K · 5 transactions
$86K
PARTY_C00140590
for them $83K · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$83K
314 ACTION FUND
for them $0 · against them $75K · 1 transactions
$75K
COMMITTEE FOR WORKING FAMILIES, SPONSORED BY LABOR ORGANIZATIONS
for them $3K · against them $68K · 11 transactions
$71K
Groups that hide their donors
501(c)(4) probable · support
$32K
Independent-expenditure entity · support
$12K
c4-funded super PAC · support
$7K
c4-funded super PAC · oppose
$1K
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$19
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
JEFFREY J KOLOZE
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX · OH · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$8K
GEORGE ERBACHER
OK · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$3K
THOMAS MORRIS
DIMOCK CENTER · MA · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$2K
EDWIN BOTERO
JBS SWIFT · CO · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$300
NEVADANS FOR STEVEN HORSFORD
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
TITUS FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
SUSIE LEE FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$79K
GEORGE SOROS
SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT · NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$525.74M
SMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$81.00M
BLACKPAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$47.25M
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

312 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $1.73M to Young Kim across 798 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $1.73M
Shared contributors 312
Contributions 798
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 95 193 $323K
2024 187 360 $404K
2026 80 245 $1.00M
— ◊ —

Young Kim's file shows clear influence markers across multiple categories for the top funding network, placing them in the upper range of this Congress. The pattern runs above what coincidence would produce, and the methodology page documents what each category requires.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required