Nanette Diaz Barragán
Democrat
· CA-44 · 119th Congress
and Operations (Chair) · House Committee on Energy and Commerce · House Committee on Homeland Security · and Accountability
Influence Score
62.9
Moderately exposed
↓ -3.1
vs 118th (66.0)
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
5.4
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.8
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$101,726
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
5.6
/ 10
Revolving door
former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
7.1
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
12.8
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
6.0
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
3.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
9.2
/ 12
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $34.44M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $69K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
| Congress | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| 116th · 2019-2021 | 63.8 | Moderately exposed |
| 117th · 2021-2023 | 61.1 | Moderately exposed |
| 118th · 2023-2025 | 66.0 | Moderately exposed |
| 119th · 2025-2027 | 62.9 | Moderately exposed |
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Network
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FOR AMERICA
Total money from this network
$67,000
Number of funding networks contributing
1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Network
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FOR AMERICA
Share from this one network
1.6%
Amount from this network
$33,500
Total from all networks
$2,115,434
Networks contributing
328
— ◊ —
Who funds Barragán
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
$1,044,319
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
94.8%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
88.1%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Biggest clusters of timed money
METHODIST HOSPITAL OF SOUTHERN CALIFOR
$25
METHODIST HOSPITAL SOCAL
$25
METHODIST HOSPITAL SOCAL
$25
METHODIST HOSPITAL SOCAL
$25
METHODIST HOSPITAL SOCAL
$25
METHODIST HOSPITAL SOCAL
$25
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
$6.70M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
$6.43M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
$6.33M
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
$5.67M
BOEING
$4.38M
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
$3.79M
BOEING
$3.61M
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
$3.45M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$3.32M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$3.12M
GENERAL MOTORS
$3.03M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
$3.02M
EY
$3.01M
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
$2.97M
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
$2.92M
CHARTER
$2.64M
COMCAST CC OF WILLOW GROVE
$2.63M
CHARTER
$2.51M
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES
$2.17M
COMCAST CC OF WILLOW GROVE
$2.07M
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Nanette Diaz Barragán comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received
$103K
Disclosed outside spending
$103K
Dark-money outside spending
$8
Share that is dark money
0.01%
Dark money tied to their policy areas
$0
Groups hiding their donors
1
By funding network
AMERICA UNITED
$100K
COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC
$3K
TOGETHER WE THRIVE
$750
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY ACTION FUND
$593
DEMOCRACY PAC
$191
AFRICAN AMERICAN VOTER REGISTRATION EDUCATION AND PARTICIPATION PROJECT
$130
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
$50
ENVIRONMENT AMERICA ACTION FUND
$29
DIGNITY CA SEIU LOCAL 2015
$6
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
$8
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member
Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
NEVADANS FOR STEVEN HORSFORD
$80K
TITUS FOR CONGRESS
$80K
SUSIE LEE FOR CONGRESS
$79K
GEORGE SOROS
$525.74M
SMP
$81.00M
BLACKPAC
$47.25M
AB PAC
$25.50M
HMP
$15.00M
HOUSE MAJORITY PAC
$15.00M
CARE IN ACTION PAC
$6.60M
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
130 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $1.05M to Nanette Diaz Barragán across 268 contributions.
Total from shared contributors
$1.05M
Shared contributors
130
Contributions
268
By cycle
| Cycle | Shared donors | Gifts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 57 | 73 | $158K |
| 2024 | 75 | 117 | $435K |
| 2026 | 38 | 78 | $461K |
— ◊ —
Nanette Diaz Barragán sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required