Emily Randall
Democrat
· WA-6 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Natural Resources · House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Influence Score
48.7
Least exposed
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
2.4
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
4.2
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$2,694,124
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
4.0
/ 10
Revolving door
former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
9.2
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
11.3
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
4.1
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
1.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
2.4
/ 12
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $22.91M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing Japan, South Korea, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $46K.
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Network
FAIRSHAKE
Total money from this network
$1,491,280
Number of funding networks contributing
1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Network
EQUALITY PAC
Share from this one network
5.2%
Amount from this network
$33,500
Total from all networks
$639,925
Networks contributing
141
— ◊ —
Who funds Randall
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
$3,117,872
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
13.3%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
97.5%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
USPS
$2.04M
INTEGRATED ARCHIVE SYSTEMS
$2.00M
AH CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
$1.76M
CHARTER
$1.41M
UNITED AIRLINES
$1.32M
MICROSOFT
$1.27M
STANDFORD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
$1.00M
GOOGLE
$942K
GENERAL MOTORS
$907K
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
$769K
SV ANGEL
$703K
FORD MOTOR
$634K
AMAZON COM SERVICES
$573K
AFSCME INT L
$564K
MICROSOFT
$562K
VERIZON RSRCS
$545K
DELTA AIR LINES
$534K
DE SHAW
$525K
PFIZER
$505K
NETAPP
$500K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Emily Randall comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received
$2.69M
Disclosed outside spending
$2.69M
Dark-money outside spending
$10
Share that is dark money
0.00%
Dark money tied to their policy areas
$10
Groups hiding their donors
1
By funding network
FAIRSHAKE
$1.49M
EQUALITY PAC
$908K
COLUMBIA NEIGHBORS PAC
$224K
PROJECT 218
$62K
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE PAC , SERVING WA, AK, ID, HI, IN, KY
$8K
TOGETHER FOR PROGRESS
$606
LCV VICTORY FUND
$10
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
$10
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
$10
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
27 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $175K to Emily Randall across 38 contributions.
Total from shared contributors
$175K
Shared contributors
27
Contributions
38
By cycle
| Cycle | Shared donors | Gifts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 24 | 29 | $55K |
| 2026 | 5 | 9 | $120K |
— ◊ —
Emily Randall ranks among the least exposed members of this Congress relative to their colleagues. Money may flow, but the votes do not track the top funding networks. Least exposed is a relative position, not a finding of no exposure.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required