Donald S. Beyer
Democrat · VA-8 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Science (Chair) · Joint Economic Committee (Chair) · and Technology · House Committee on Ways and Means
Influence Score
70.0
Moderately exposed
↑ +6.0 vs 118th (63.8)
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
4.9
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
< 0.1
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$199
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
8.3
/ 10
Revolving door (1 lobbyist) former staff now working as lobbyists
0.6
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
6.5
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
1.4
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.3
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
13.5
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
5.4
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
4.0
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
10.9
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
JSTREETPAC $4,800 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $53.25M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $107K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 73.2 Highly exposed
117th · 2021-2023 74.2 Highly exposed
118th · 2023-2025 63.8 Moderately exposed
119th · 2025-2027 69.8 Moderately exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $60,000
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 1.7%
Amount from this network $30,000
Total from all networks $1,820,542
Networks contributing 295
— ◊ —
Who funds Beyer
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 70.0 · Moderately exposed · votes with them 79%
$864,253
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 1.0%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 76.1%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 6
Money that arrived near votes $20K
Distinct donors 9
Distinct employers 5
Share of their total fundraising 1.17%
Biggest clusters of timed money
BURKE HERBERT BANK
20230417 · 2 contributions · Finance · 9d from vote (pre)
$7K
GENERATION INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
20240207 · 2 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (post)
$7K
WEISSBERG INVESTMENT
20230926 · 2 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (pre)
$2K
DEUTSCHE BANK
20240702 · 1 contributions · Finance · 4d from vote (mixed)
$2K
MAHMOOD INVESTMENT
20240523 · 1 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (post)
$1K
MAHMOOD INVESTMENT
20230606 · 1 contributions · Finance · 6d from vote (mixed)
$1K
JKJ FINANCIAL SERVICES
20231027 · 1 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (mixed)
$500
NEA
20240728 · 1 contributions · Finance · 4d from vote (post)
$500
SUNTRUST BANK
20230606 · 1 contributions · Finance · 6d from vote (mixed)
$500
AE FINANCIAL
20230315 · 1 contributions · Finance · 14d from vote (post)
$250
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
83,444 contributions · cycle 2024
$6.70M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
57,950 contributions · cycle 2024
$6.43M
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
77,585 contributions · cycle 2022
$5.67M
BOEING
73,517 contributions · cycle 2024
$4.41M
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
43,671 contributions · cycle 2026
$3.79M
BOEING
64,678 contributions · cycle 2022
$3.61M
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
90,829 contributions · cycle 2022
$3.45M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
33,482 contributions · cycle 2022
$3.32M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
31,539 contributions · cycle 2024
$3.15M
GENERAL MOTORS
78,946 contributions · cycle 2022
$3.03M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
26,773 contributions · cycle 2026
$3.02M
EY
3,489 contributions · cycle 2022
$3.00M
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
75,465 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.99M
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
4,345 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.92M
HARRIS
9,814 contributions · cycle 2022
$2.32M
USPS
65,332 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.10M
COMCAST CC OF WILLOW GROVE
45,940 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.07M
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
25,403 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.06M
BOEING
32,102 contributions · cycle 2026
$2.05M
HARRIS
8,348 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.04M
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Donald S. Beyer comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $9K
Disclosed outside spending $9K
Dark-money outside spending $8
Share that is dark money 0.09%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $0
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
DEMOCRACY PAC
for them $191 · against them $0 · 7 transactions
$191
DEMOCRATIC ASIAN AMERICANS OF VIRGINIA
for them $140 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$140
NEA ADVOCACY FUND
for them $68 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$68
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
for them $40 · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$40
ENVIRONMENT AMERICA ACTION FUND
for them $31 · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$31
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$8
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
NEVADANS FOR STEVEN HORSFORD
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
TITUS FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
SUSIE LEE FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$79K
GEORGE SOROS
SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT · NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$525.74M
SMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$81.00M
BLACKPAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$47.25M
AB PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$25.50M
HMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
HOUSE MAJORITY PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
CARE IN ACTION PAC
NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$6.60M
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

134 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $549K to Donald S. Beyer across 391 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $549K
Shared contributors 134
Contributions 391
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 78 131 $195K
2024 78 155 $240K
2026 44 105 $114K
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
1 former staff member who worked for Donald S. Beyer or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
Lobbyist Former position Firm Clients Filings Years
MEGHAN FLYNN Intern, Congressman Don Beyer PENN HILL GROUP 8 9 2023–2025
— ◊ —

Donald S. Beyer sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required