Mark E Harris
Republican
· NC-8 · 119th Congress
Influence Score
0.0
Not scored
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
0.0
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.0
/ 6
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
0.0
/ 10
Revolving door
former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
0.0
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.0
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
0.0
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
0.0
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
0.0
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
0.0
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
$4,994 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $33.40M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $67K.
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
No top sponsor identified.
— ◊ —
Who funds Harris
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
No sponsor relationships on file.
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
0.0%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
1.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
0.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
INFORMATION REQUESTED PER BEST EFFORTS
$719K
CVS HEALTH
$713K
MCDONALD S
$428K
BLACKROCK
$327K
ZURICH AMERICAN INS
$251K
VENABLE LLP
$233K
BROWN RIDING INSURANCE SERVICES
$232K
HOMEMAKER
$149K
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES
$148K
GRAY MEDIA
$145K
FARM CREDIT MID-AMERICA
$143K
COTTINGHAM BUTLER
$142K
BLACKROCK FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
$135K
WEYERHAEUSER NR
$134K
SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE SPIRITS
$128K
LORD ABBETT
$128K
PATRIOT GROWTH INSURANCE SERVICES
$111K
KIRKLAND ELLIS LLP
$108K
NRECA
$107K
0035 TYSON SHARED SERVICES
$104K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Mark E Harris comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
By funding network
HOUSE FREEDOM ACTION
$255
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
23 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $32K to Mark E Harris across 31 contributions.
Total from shared contributors
$32K
Shared contributors
23
Contributions
31
By cycle
| Cycle | Shared donors | Gifts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 18 | 23 | $17K |
| 2026 | 5 | 8 | $15K |
— ◊ —
Mark E Harris is not scored: there is no usable voting record to rank against — either the vote and contribution records have not yet been matched to this member, or this is a non-voting delegate. This is the absence of a score, not a finding of low exposure.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required