Ruben Gallego
Democrat · AZ-3 · 118th Congress
Influence Score
81.7
Most exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
4.9
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
3.8
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$3,520,588
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
4.9
/ 10
Revolving door (2 lobbyists) former staff now working as lobbyists
0.8
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
10.9
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
6.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
11.5
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
10.0
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
4.5
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
7.9
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $7,900 direct
DMFI PAC $2,000 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $39.50M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $79K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 60.3 Moderately exposed
117th · 2021-2023 66.6 Moderately exposed
118th · 2023-2025 81.7 Most exposed
119th · 2025-2027 67.2 Moderately exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
No top sponsor identified.
— ◊ —
Who funds Gallego
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 81.7 · Most exposed · votes with them 96%
$4,387,125
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 0.0%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 0.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
57,972 contributions · cycle 2024
$6.43M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
62,034 contributions · cycle 2022
$6.33M
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
77,585 contributions · cycle 2022
$5.67M
BOEING
64,852 contributions · cycle 2022
$3.62M
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
90,867 contributions · cycle 2022
$3.45M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
33,494 contributions · cycle 2022
$3.32M
GENERAL MOTORS
78,951 contributions · cycle 2022
$3.03M
EY
3,492 contributions · cycle 2022
$3.01M
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
75,130 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.97M
COMCAST CC OF WILLOW GROVE
60,644 contributions · cycle 2022
$2.63M
CHARTER
43,977 contributions · cycle 2022
$2.51M
SCHUSTERMAN INTERESTS
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$2.50M
HARRIS
9,814 contributions · cycle 2022
$2.32M
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES
9,412 contributions · cycle 2022
$2.17M
GLOBAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT
11,040 contributions · cycle 2022
$2.02M
BNSF RAILWAY
34,257 contributions · cycle 2022
$1.99M
UP RAILROAD
10,782 contributions · cycle 2022
$1.70M
USPS
57,650 contributions · cycle 2022
$1.68M
THE ANTHEM COMPANIES
20,642 contributions · cycle 2022
$1.52M
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
46,388 contributions · cycle 2022
$1.37M
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Ruben Gallego comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $469K
Disclosed outside spending $70K
Dark-money outside spending $399K
Share that is dark money 85.11%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $0
Groups hiding their donors 3
By funding network
WORKER POWER
for them $397K · against them $0 · 563 transactions
$397K
MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION
for them $21K · against them $0 · 11 transactions
$21K
SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)
for them $15K · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$15K
VOTE FOR EQUALITY
for them $8K · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$8K
LATINO VICTORY FUND
for them $5K · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$5K
FEMINIST MAJORITY
for them $2K · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$2K
VICTORY PAC
for them $1K · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$1K
TOGETHER WE THRIVE
for them $750 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$750
DEMOCRACY PAC
for them $271 · against them $0 · 8 transactions
$271
THE PEOPLE UNITED PAC
for them $225 · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$225
NEA ADVOCACY FUND
for them $67 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$67
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
for them $30 · against them $0 · 3 transactions
$30
Groups that hide their donors
501(c)(4) probable · support
$397K
Independent-expenditure entity · support
$2K
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$8
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
NEVADANS FOR STEVEN HORSFORD
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
TITUS FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
SUSIE LEE FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$79K
GEORGE SOROS
SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT · NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$525.74M
SMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$81.00M
BLACKPAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$47.25M
AB PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$25.50M
HMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
HOUSE MAJORITY PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
CARE IN ACTION PAC
NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$6.60M
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

393 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $737K to Ruben Gallego across 685 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $737K
Shared contributors 393
Contributions 685
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 49 61 $234K
2024 352 620 $499K
2026 2 4 $3K
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
2 former staff members who worked for Ruben Gallego or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
Lobbyist Former position Firm Clients Filings Years
ED GERAK Senator Sinema, Senator Kelly, Congressman Grijalva, Congressman Ciscomani and C… IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA, INC. 1 4 2023–2025
JENELL BIGGS SMOLOVA Senator Kelly and Rep. Gallego offices UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 1 2023–2025
— ◊ —

Ruben Gallego ranks among the most exposed members of this Congress — the top tier on the index. The markers run across several of the twelve categories for the same funding network: contributions, outside spending, lobbying inside the policy areas this member regulates, vote alignment, and contribution timing among them. The score measures financial exposure in the public record; it is not a finding of intent or wrongdoing.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required