Gary J. Palmer
Republican · AL-6 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Energy and Commerce · House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform · Energy Policy · and Regulatory Affairs · House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Public Buildings · and Emergency Management · House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis
Influence Score
54.4
Moderately exposed
↓ -0.9 vs 118th (56.0)
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
2.6
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.0
/ 6
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
6.1
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
5.4
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.5
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.0
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
12.7
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
4.2
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
4.7
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
7.3
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,006 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $45.10M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $90K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 36.4 Least exposed
117th · 2021-2023 42.8 Least exposed
118th · 2023-2025 56.0 Moderately exposed
119th · 2025-2027 55.1 Moderately exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $37,500
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 9.4%
Amount from this network $131,018
Total from all networks $1,393,275
Networks contributing 245
— ◊ —
Who funds Palmer
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 54.4 · Moderately exposed · votes with them 75%
$462,750
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 1.3%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 0.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 2
Money that arrived near votes $5K
Distinct donors 2
Distinct employers 2
Share of their total fundraising 0.39%
Biggest clusters of timed money
SERVICE DATA
20240430 · 1 contributions · Tech · 1d from vote (mixed)
$3K
SUMMIT PETROLEUM
20240430 · 1 contributions · Energy · 1d from vote (pre)
$2K
COVINGTON BURLING LLP
20230516 · 1 contributions · Judiciary · 1d from vote (mixed)
$500
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
CITADEL ASSET MANAGEMENT
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$17.00M
EMC
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$15.51M
ADELSON DRUG CLINIC
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$10.00M
STG
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$10.00M
REYES
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$9.01M
CROWNQUEST OPERATING
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$5.01M
THE DUCHOSSOIS
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$4.51M
MOUNTAIRE
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$4.51M
PATHWAYS ORG
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$4.50M
RYAN SPECIALTY
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$4.50M
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
43,673 contributions · cycle 2026
$3.79M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
26,773 contributions · cycle 2026
$3.02M
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
4,322 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.92M
STEPHENS
11 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.77M
COMCAST CC OF WILLOW GROVE
60,644 contributions · cycle 2022
$2.63M
THE ELEVANCE HEALTH COMPANIES
33,199 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.53M
GENERAL MOTORS
60,944 contributions · cycle 2022
$2.25M
COMCAST CC OF WILLOW GROVE
45,940 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.07M
HARRIS
8,341 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.04M
THE CHARLES SCHWAB
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$2.01M
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Gary J. Palmer comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
By funding network
HOUSE FREEDOM ACTION
for them $4K · against them $0 · 11 transactions
$4K
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND)
for them $0 · against them $861 · 2 transactions
$861
TOGETHER WE THRIVE
for them $0 · against them $750 · 1 transactions
$750
CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION
for them $49 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$49
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

68 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $604K to Gary J. Palmer across 109 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $604K
Shared contributors 68
Contributions 109
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 37 43 $451K
2024 40 60 $119K
2026 5 6 $34K
— ◊ —

Gary J. Palmer sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required