Doug Lamalfa
Republican
· CA-1 · 119th Congress
Influence Score
0.0
Not scored
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
0.0
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.0
/ 6
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
0.0
/ 10
Revolving door
former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
0.0
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.0
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
0.0
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
0.0
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
0.0
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
0.0
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
$11,004 direct
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
No top sponsor identified.
— ◊ —
Who funds Lamalfa
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
No sponsor relationships on file.
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
0.0%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
1.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
0.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
BOEING
$4.39M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$3.35M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$3.13M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
$3.02M
GENERAL MOTORS
$2.25M
COMCAST CC OF WILLOW GROVE
$2.07M
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
$2.06M
BNSF RAILWAY
$1.99M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$1.87M
BNSF RAILWAY
$1.84M
UP RAILROAD
$1.76M
UP RAILROAD
$1.70M
AMERICAN AIRLINES
$1.67M
ENTREPRENEUR
$1.60M
ERNST YOUNG U S LLP
$1.53M
DELTA AIR LINES
$1.48M
EY
$1.44M
USPS
$1.18M
CSX
$1.17M
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
$1.16M
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Doug Lamalfa comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
By funding network
ACTIVATE AMERICA
$8K
MAD DOG PAC
$5K
AMERICANS FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IN LEADERSHIP
$2K
THE REALLY ONLINE LEFTY LEAGUE
$981
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND)
$861
PARTY_C00455352
$773
REFORM LEADERS PAC
$157
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
29 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $216K to Doug Lamalfa across 46 contributions.
Total from shared contributors
$216K
Shared contributors
29
Contributions
46
By cycle
| Cycle | Shared donors | Gifts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 5 | 14 | $158K |
| 2024 | 24 | 30 | $57K |
| 2026 | 2 | 2 | $2K |
— ◊ —
Doug Lamalfa is not scored: there is no usable voting record to rank against — either the vote and contribution records have not yet been matched to this member, or this is a non-voting delegate. This is the absence of a score, not a finding of low exposure.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required