Blake D. Moore
Republican
· UT-1 · 117th Congress
House Committee on Armed Services · Innovative Technologies · and Information Systems · House Committee on Natural Resources · and Public Lands · House Committee on Ways and Means · House Committee on the Budget
Influence Score
65.2
Moderately exposed
↑ +5.4
vs 118th (75.8)
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
5.3
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.6
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$93,145
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$13,380
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
8.7
/ 10
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
12.0
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
1.1
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.0
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
9.8
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
0.2
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
4.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
8.7
/ 12
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $166.71M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $333K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
| Congress | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| 116th · 2019-2021 | — | — |
| 117th · 2021-2023 | 65.2 | Moderately exposed |
| 118th · 2023-2025 | 75.8 | Highly exposed |
| 119th · 2025-2027 | 81.2 | Highly exposed |
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network
$139,701
Number of funding networks contributing
1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Network
CENTER FORWARD INITIATIVE INC
Share from this one network
2.9%
Amount from this network
$99,832
Total from all networks
$3,451,360
Networks contributing
490
— ◊ —
Who funds Moore
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
$1,024,432
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
99.0%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
99.3%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote
13
Money that arrived near votes
$36K
Distinct donors
16
Distinct employers
7
Share of their total fundraising
1.97%
Biggest clusters of timed money
PAUL WEISS WHARTON RIFKIND GARRISON
$10K
JANE STREET
$7K
DELOITTE TAX LLP
$3K
JANE STREET
$3K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT
$2K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT
$2K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT
$2K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT
$2K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT
$2K
ATTORNEY
$2K
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
$6.69M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
$6.43M
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
$5.67M
BOEING
$4.40M
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
$3.79M
BOEING
$3.61M
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
$3.45M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$3.33M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$3.13M
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
$3.02M
EY
$3.01M
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
$2.97M
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
$2.93M
THE ELEVANCE HEALTH COMPANIES
$2.53M
HARRIS
$2.32M
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES
$2.16M
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES
$2.06M
BOEING
$2.04M
HARRIS
$2.04M
GLOBAL WEALTH MANAGEMENT
$2.02M
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Blake D. Moore comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
By funding network
EARN INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS
$93K
NATIONAL HORIZON
$13K
HUNTER ACTION FUND (HAF)
$670
NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND
$8
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
100 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $774K to Blake D. Moore across 153 contributions.
Total from shared contributors
$774K
Shared contributors
100
Contributions
153
By cycle
| Cycle | Shared donors | Gifts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 30 | 31 | $54K |
| 2024 | 58 | 90 | $344K |
| 2026 | 25 | 32 | $376K |
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
3 former staff members
who worked for Blake D. Moore or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
| Lobbyist | Former position | Firm | Clients | Filings | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAURA PETERSON | Legal Intern, Senate Judiciary Committee (D-Feinstein), 2008; Congressional Inte… | LAURA WOOD PETERSON CONSULTING, INC. | 8 | 56 | 2023–2025 |
| LAURA WOOD | egal Intern, Senate Judiciary Committee (D-Feinstein), 2008; Congressional Inter… | INARI | 1 | 8 | 2023–2025 |
| LAURA WOOD | Legal Intern, Senate Judiciary Committee (D-Feinstein), 2008; Congressional Inte… | GWC PUBLIC AFFAIRS LLC | 1 | 3 | 2023–2024 |
— ◊ —
Blake D. Moore sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required