Kat Cammack
Republican
· FL-3 · 119th Congress
and Recovery (Chair) · House Committee on Agriculture · and Credit · Digital Assets · and Rural Development · and Department Operations · House Committee on Energy and Commerce · and Trade · House Committee on Homeland Security · House Select Committee on Economic Disparity and Fairness in Growth
Influence Score
52.7
Moderately exposed
↓ -3.4
vs 118th (56.0)
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
5.1
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
2.1
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$652,817
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
6.1
/ 10
Revolving door
former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
4.3
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.5
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
11.2
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
5.9
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
4.0
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
3.1
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (RJC-PAC)
$244 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $39.36M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $79K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
| Congress | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| 116th · 2019-2021 | — | — |
| 117th · 2021-2023 | 50.5 | Moderately exposed |
| 118th · 2023-2025 | 56.0 | Moderately exposed |
| 119th · 2025-2027 | 52.6 | Moderately exposed |
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network
$185,221
Number of funding networks contributing
1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Network
AMERICAN VICTORY FUND
Share from this one network
2.0%
Amount from this network
$43,355
Total from all networks
$2,152,949
Networks contributing
381
— ◊ —
Who funds Cammack
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
$1,547,311
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
2.3%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
0.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote
2
Money that arrived near votes
$6K
Distinct donors
3
Distinct employers
1
Share of their total fundraising
0.38%
Biggest clusters of timed money
MILLER PIPELINE
$4K
MILLER PIPELINE
$2K
FARM BUREAU
$800
LAKE CITY MEDICAL CENTER
$208
NORTH FLORIDA HOSPITAL
$20
NORTH FLORIDA HOSPITAL
$20
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
$6.69M
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
$5.67M
BOEING
$4.39M
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
$3.79M
BOEING
$3.65M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$3.35M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$3.12M
NORTHROP GRUMMAN
$2.97M
CHARTER
$2.64M
COMCAST CC OF WILLOW GROVE
$2.63M
THE ELEVANCE HEALTH COMPANIES
$2.53M
CHARTER
$2.51M
HOMEMAKER
$2.39M
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES
$2.16M
COMCAST CC OF WILLOW GROVE
$2.07M
MOUNTAIRE
$2.05M
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
$2.01M
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES
$1.93M
LOCKHEED MARTIN
$1.86M
GENERAL MOTORS
$1.72M
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Kat Cammack comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received
$622K
Disclosed outside spending
$252K
Dark-money outside spending
$370K
Share that is dark money
59.54%
Dark money tied to their policy areas
$0
Groups hiding their donors
1
By funding network
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION
$370K
PROTECT FREEDOM POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
$353K
AMERICAN DREAMS PAC
$250K
LATINOS FOR CONSERVATIVE VALUES
$31K
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP FUND INC.
$8K
THE GUARDIAN FUND
$8K
NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND
$5K
DISABLED VETERANS PAC
$687
Groups that hide their donors
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
44 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $180K to Kat Cammack across 114 contributions.
Total from shared contributors
$180K
Shared contributors
44
Contributions
114
By cycle
| Cycle | Shared donors | Gifts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 12 | 12 | $16K |
| 2024 | 28 | 94 | $159K |
| 2026 | 7 | 8 | $5K |
— ◊ —
Kat Cammack sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required